Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Matteo Fago vs Dragos Dima Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Fago vs Dima analysis and find out who is favored!
Matteo Fago vs Dragos Dima Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Fago 1 - 0 Dima
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Fago has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Dima has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Fago, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Dima has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Fago has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Dima has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Fago has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Dima winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Fago has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 71% (W/L 25/ 10), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 25% (W/L 1/ 3). Dima has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 62% (W/L 258/ 160), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 50% (W/L 2/ 2).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Fago winning 1 times and Dima being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Fago winning 2 and Dima winning 1. The last match between Fago and Dima was at the Croatia F5, 26-03-2012, First, Clay with Matteo Fago getting the victory 5-7 7-6(1) 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Fago and Dima have played a deciding set 1 times, with Fago winning 1 times and Dima 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Fago winning 1, and Dima 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Fago has played against opponents with an average rank of while Dima has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Fago has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Dima has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Fago has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Dima has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Ret.
Rank
667
High
36
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
895
Rank
279
High
31
Age
R
Plays
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
Form
W
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
48% (111-121)
Career Total W/L
61% (282-181)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Matteo Fago | Dragos Dima |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 18 | 15 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5-7 7-6(1) 6-2 | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Matteo Fago | Dragos Dima |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Matteo Fago Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats 
Gianluca Di Nicola
Player
Matteo Fago
59%
(
51 of
87)
1st Serve %
64%
(
39 of
61)
1
Aces
4
7
Double Faults
1
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
39%
(
14 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
45%
(
39 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
31 of
61)
79
Total Points Won
69
|
6-2 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matteo Fago
Player
Gianluca Acquaroli
63%
(
39 of
62)
1st Serve %
45%
(
21 of
47)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
56%
(
22 of
39)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
45%
(
28 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
25 of
47)
59
Total Points Won
50
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Yannick Hanfmann
Player
Matteo Fago
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve %
57%
(
30 of
53)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
73%
(
11 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
12 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
29 of
53)
64
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matteo Fago
Player
Leon Hoeveler
57%
(
26 of
46)
1st Serve %
52%
(
25 of
48)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
77%
(
20 of
26)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
14 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
29 of
48)
61
Total Points Won
33
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Juan Pablo Paz
Player
Matteo Fago
67%
(
35 of
52)
1st Serve %
71%
(
55 of
78)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
33 of
55)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
17 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
39 of
78)
74
Total Points Won
56
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Matteo Fago
Player
Davide Galoppini
53%
(
54 of
101)
1st Serve %
58%
(
65 of
113)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
72%
(
39 of
54)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
36 of
65)
47%
(
22 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
40%
(
40 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
53 of
113)
114
Total Points Won
100
|
6-3 5-7 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matteo Fago
Player
Tsung-Hua Yang
49%
(
37 of
75)
1st Serve %
65%
(
51 of
79)
4
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
3
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
32 of
51)
42%
(
16 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
40%
(
30 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
37 of
79)
82
Total Points Won
72
|
7-6(2) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daniele Capecchi
Player
Matteo Fago
54%
(
28 of
52)
1st Serve %
55%
(
28 of
51)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
3
68%
(
19 of
28)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
71%
(
17 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
31%
(
16 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
27 of
51)
63
Total Points Won
40
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Matteo Fago
Player
Federico Bonacia
56%
(
45 of
81)
1st Serve %
53%
(
49 of
93)
0
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
4
58%
(
26 of
45)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
24 of
49)
42%
(
15 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
17 of
44)
64%
(
9 of
14)
Break Points Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
49%
(
40 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
52 of
93)
93
Total Points Won
81
|
4-6 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matteo Fago
Player
Riccardo Sinicropi
55%
(
46 of
83)
1st Serve %
45%
(
37 of
83)
2
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
3
65%
(
30 of
46)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
29 of
37)
62%
(
23 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
18 of
46)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
36%
(
30 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
36 of
83)
89
Total Points Won
77
|
6-4 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
view more
Dragos Dima Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Dan Alexandru Tomescu
Player
Dragos Dima
64%
(
53 of
83)
1st Serve %
61%
(
55 of
90)
2
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
0
62%
(
33 of
53)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
35 of
55)
37%
(
11 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
47%
(
39 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
39 of
90)
83
Total Points Won
90
|
3-6 7-6(4) 10-7 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Dragos Dima
Player
Rik Muller
76%
(
34 of
45)
1st Serve %
60%
(
26 of
43)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
11 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
56
Total Points Won
32
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-0 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Dan Alexandru Tomescu
Player
Dragos Dima
69%
(
41 of
59)
1st Serve %
57%
(
28 of
49)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
85%
(
35 of
41)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
22%
(
4 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
14 of
21)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
34%
(
20 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
18 of
49)
57
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Dragos Dima
Player
Cihan Akay
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve %
72%
(
39 of
54)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
95%
(
21 of
22)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
17 of
39)
70%
(
7 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
13%
(
4 of
32)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
32 of
54)
60
Total Points Won
26
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Maxime Chazal
Player
Dragos Dima
76%
(
61 of
80)
1st Serve %
66%
(
53 of
80)
1
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
2
64%
(
39 of
61)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
30 of
53)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
38%
(
30 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
35 of
80)
85
Total Points Won
75
|
6-2 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Dragos Dima
Player
Lucio Carnevalle
50%
(
23 of
46)
1st Serve %
74%
(
50 of
68)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
78%
(
18 of
23)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
28 of
50)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
14 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
35 of
68)
67
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dragos Dima
Player
Mathieu Perchicot
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve %
49%
(
26 of
53)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
28%
(
14 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
29 of
53)
65
Total Points Won
38
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Dragos Dima
Player
Mikhail Fufygin
61%
(
35 of
57)
1st Serve %
60%
(
37 of
62)
1
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
2
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
26%
(
15 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
27 of
62)
69
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Fago Vs Dima Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
